January 23, 1891: Holmes “incommoded” Moriarty. [FINA]
On January 22nd…
January 22, 1897: Holmes allowed Captain Croker to go free by the British Gentleman’s Code of Ethics. [ABBE]
On January 21st…
January 21, 1897: Sir Eustace Brackenstall was killed by Captain James Croker. [ABBE]
January 21, 1897: Theresa Wright, Lady Brackenstall’s maid, said she saw three men in the moonlight. [ABBE]
Sherlock Holmes and the Eisendorf Enigma (Book Review)
Sherlock Holmes and the Eisendorf Enigma
by Larry Millett
University of Minnesota Press (February 2017)
240 p. ISBN 9781517900861
Publisher’s Summary
Dogged by depression, doubt, and—as a trip to the Mayo Clinic has revealed—emphysema, 66-year-old Sherlock Holmes is preparing to return to England when he receives a shock: a note slipped under his hotel room door, from a vicious murderer he’d nearly captured in Munich in 1892. The murderer, known as the Monster of Munich, announces that he has relocated to Eisendorf, a tiny village near the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
If Holmes is not what he once was, the same can be said for Eisendorf: once a thriving community founded by German idealists but now a dying town with only forty residents—two of whom have, indeed, died recently under highly mysterious circumstances. Replete with all the gothic richness of Larry Millett’s earlier Holmes novels, Sherlock Holmes and the Eisendorf Enigma links events in 1892 Germany with those in small-town Minnesota in 1920 in a double mystery that tests the aging detective’s mettle—and the reader’s nerve—as never before.
Guided by Eisendorf’s peculiar archivist and taunted by the Monster, Holmes finds himself drawn into the town’s dark history of violence and secrecy, and into the strange tunnels that underscore the old flour mill where answers, and grievous danger, lie in wait. No longer the cool, flawless logician of times past, Holmes must nonetheless match wits with a fiendish opponent who taunts him right up to a final, explosive confrontation.
General Review
Taking place during the Retirement Years, even past World War I, Eisendorf Enigma is a fun, fast-paced mystery. I was very excited when NetGalley sent me an ARC of Millett’s latest Sherlock Holmes novel- growing up, his novels were some of the first pastiches I encountered- and I’m deeply grateful to them for the opportunity to read this book in advance and comment on it.
The story begins quickly, almost abruptly, with the reader being introduced to several things at once, including Holmes’ illness and his history in Munich, before we find ourselves in Eisendorf itself, meeting our cast of suspects. Eisendorf is a miniscule German village in Minnesota, and it’s layered in secrets. It is fascinating to see Holmes attempt to tease out information from people when literally everyone he meets lies to him or misdirects him, and the only records he can consult are written by the same people who are lying to him. Although the book starts very quickly, it soon adjusts to a slower, more measured pace that absolutely suits the very Southern Gothic atmosphere of this book. We spend a great deal of time meeting the inhabitants of the town, few as they are, and learning the history and the founding of Eisendorf. In between these moments, we flash back to 1892 Munich, when Holmes first encountered the serial killer known as the Monster. The two stories are woven together well, each contributing new insights to the other.
Millett has always been phenomenal at writing eccentrics (many familiar with the series will well remember Shadwell Rafferty, who dominated Millett’s later books; while Rafferty appears in this book, he is not a main character), and it shines through here. Eisendorf is full of strange people. There’s the archivist, who notes down every detail of the town and whom Holmes cannot unravel; the young woman with a childish spirit who wears angel wings and claims to know secrets; the recluse who threatens Holmes whenever they meet; the outcast whose actions during World War I endangered much of the town; the town leader and his wife, who make for an odd pair; and the widow, that Holmes finds captivating. The secondary characters are delightful, and it is enjoyable trying to sort out which among them may have a motive and committed the crimes Holmes is investigating.
Millett’s descriptions are lush and rich, and anyone who likes to craft a good visual in their head will appreciate his attention to detail with the setting. Minnesota is a beautiful place, and the author’s descriptions create a written picture that will match any photos you pull up on the Internet or in a book.
The first two-thirds of the book are from a third-person perspective, following Holmes, which could be disconcerting for readers used to Watson’s first-person perspective. Thankfully, in the last third of the book, we return to what we are used to. The first part of the book is still well done, however, if occasionally too willing to repeat internal thoughts of Holmes’ that don’t need to be stated with such frequency.
It’s a charming, quick book, and I enjoyed it immensely. I hope Millett will consider writing more works in this timeline, one rarely explored by pastiche writers. It would be lovely to have a set of books that focus on the cases of Holmes and Watson, well past retirement and post-World War I.
What About Our Watson?
For a while, I feared I would have little to report on the Watson front. The first two-thirds of the book feature Holmes by himself, without any of his usual allies or friends, in Eisendorf. I was fully prepared to write about the occasional affectionate thoughts that Holmes has for Watson, and to note that his brief appearance at the beginning is pleasant, if unsatisfying for the dedicated Watsonian.
Thankfully, however, Watson makes a heroic entrance towards the end, and while he doesn’t get to contribute much in the solving of the mystery, his personality comes through in spades. Watson rushes off to America, leaving his irate second wife behind (the second Mrs. Watson is not well liked by Holmes, or the author it would seem) in order to get to Holmes’ side. He is shown to be an excellent doctor, whose medical opinion Holmes trusts above all others, and is quick to follow through on Holmes’ strange requests. His sarcastic humor comes out at the most unexpected times, much to my amusement.
While there isn’t as much Watson content as I would like, when Watson is there, he is very recognizably Watson.
You Might Like This Book If You Like:
Minnesota; small town histories; Southern Gothic mysteries; ruminations on age and illness
On January 18th…
January 18, 1886: Lady Eva Blackwell married the Earl of Dovercourt. [CHAS]
On January 13th…
January 13, 1886: Sherlock Holmes became engaged to Milverton’s house maid. [CHAS]
January 13, 1886: Holmes and Watson burglarized Milverton’s house. [CHAS]
January 13, 1886: Charles Augustus Milverton was murdered. [CHAS]
On January 12th…
January 12, 1903: Sir James Saunders diagnosed Godfrey Emsworth’s disease as pseudo-leprosy. [BLAN]
Friend & Biographer Series: JHWS ‘Sampson’
Speaking of my old friend and biographer, I would take this opportunity to remark….Watson has some remarkable characteristics of his own, to which in his modesty he has given small attention…
Hello Watsonians,
Today marks the second post in our series of brief biographic interviews with some of the members of JHWS. Our members, like the good Dr. Watson, have some remarkable characteristics of their own, and we would like to give some small attention to them.
Please say hello to Robert Perret in the great state of Idaho. As he notes, he is currently the only JHWS member residing in Idaho.
Enjoy,
Margie/ JHWS ‘Mopsy’
- Name/with bull pup moniker—
Robert Perret / ‘Sampson’
- Current (city,state,country) location—
Troy, Idaho, USA
- How long have you been a devotee of Dr. Watson?
The first memory I have of reading the good Doctor’s reminiscences was in high school back in the early 1990’s. The school library had some sort of complete collection (Doubleday?) in that classic (to me, anyway) mid-century chocolate brown library binding.
- Do you have a favorite canonical story?
I have about 60, but if forced to pick I would say The Sign of the Four is the ultimate Holmes adventure for me. It has mystery, detection, deduction, exoticism, elements of the grotesque and even a boat chase.
- What is your favorite quote from the canon?
There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.
- If you could speak directly to anyone in the canon, who would you choose and why?
I would like to speak with the majordomo of the Diogenes Club. I’m sure he knows a few things even Mycroft is unaware of!
- Are you fond of any particular canon adaptations—pastiche, radio, film?
I love the Granada series, of course, and my mental Holmes is Basil Rathbone, but my personal favorites might just be the Robert Downey Jr. films.
- Do you have a local Watsonian/Sherlockian/Holmesian group you meet with on a regular basis?
I wish I did. My claim to fame is being the only known (to me) Sherlockian in Idaho. I hope to be able to pop into someone else’s meeting someday when I am travelling.
- Do you have any recent Watsonian/Sherlockian/Holmesian projects/events you would like to tell us about?
I have a few pastiches published that you can find out more about at robertperret.com. I also recently read every issue of the Baker Street Journal that is on the CD-ROM as part of a citation analysis that will hopefully be published soon.
- If you could change one thing in the greater Watsonian/Sherlockian/Holmesian world, what would it be?
I still see a divide between the old guard and new Sherlockians. As someone who sits between them both age-wise and interest-wise I would like to see more harmony betwixt all Sherlockians everywhere.
On January 10th…
January 10, 1885: Joseph Openshaw was killed by a fall into a chalk pit. [FIVE]
Congratulations to Six Members Receiving BSI Honours
The Society extends congratulations to six members on their investitures into the Baker Street Irregulars at this past weekend’s Annual Dinner in New York.
They are:
- Charles Blanksteen, JHWS “Patch”, BSI “Cavendish Square”
- Ross Davies, JHWS “Maximus”, BSI “The Temple”
- Bonnie MacBird, JHWS “Lady”, BSI “Art In the Blood”
- Charles Prepolec, JHWS “Jasper”, BSI “The Man with the Twisted Lip”
- Michael Quigley, JHWS “Roy”, BSI “A Large Brass Bound Safe”
- Christopher Zordan, JHWS “Flash”, BSI “Bunsen Burner”
All of the members of the Society join in extending our congratulations on this distinctive honour for all of you.
The Society also thanks the fine gentlemen at “I Hear of Sherlock Everywhere” – AKA Scott Monty, JHWS “Woolley” and BSI “Corporal Henry Wood”, and Burt Wolder, JHWS “Taylor” and BSI “Third Pillar from the Left” – for keeping us up to date on the goings-on via Twitter.
On January 8th…
January 8, 1885: Joseph Openshaw visited Major Freebody. [FIVE]
January 8, 1888: Cecil Barker fished Ted Baldwin’s clothes from the moat. [VALL]
January 8, 1888: Jack Douglas confessed to killing Ted Baldwin. [VALL]
On January 7th…
January 7, 1886: Milverton sent an incriminating note to the husband of one of his blackmailees. [CHAS]
January 7, 1888: Holmes received an encoded message from Porlock. [VALL]
January 7, 1903: James Dodd left Old Tuxbury for London, where he consulted Sherlock Holmes. [BLAN]
On January 6th…
January 6, 1886: Charles Augustus Milverton called upon Holmes at 221B Baker Street. [CHAS]
January 6, 1888: Jack Douglas shot and killed Ted Baldwin. [VALL]
January 6, 1903: Colonel Emsworth told James Dodd that he must leave Tuxsbury Old Park the next morning. [BLAN]
And the most IMPORTANT:
Friday, January 6, 1854: Sherlock Holmes was born!
On January 5th…
January 5, 1903: James Dodd traveled from London to Bedford and thence to Tuxbury Old Place. [BLAN]
January 5, 1903: James Dodd saw the face of Godfrey Emsworth at his bedroom window. [BLAN]
Test of the Professionals I: The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon (Book Review)
![](https://www.johnhwatsonsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/51WAsNSu5tL_20180917-195x300.jpg)
Test of the Professionals I: The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon
by Marcia Wilson
MXPublishing (December 2016)
273 p. ISBN 9781787050297
Publisher’s Summary
Lestrade panted, getting to his feet as the gang of Cheathams fell back. “Right now I can think of worse things than rescue by an amateur detective.”
“My dear Lestrade, we’re simply ensuring the fight is fair.” Sherlock Holmes somehow dissuaded the truth of that by the way his lips were coiling up at the edges (without letting go of the pipe in his teeth). Perhaps it was because he was clearly in disguise as a seedy deckhand in Dutchman’s sailing clothes.
From behind him the little professional could see Dr. Watson, tarred like a sailor and armed with a wicked-looking blackthorn.
“Well, then!” Lestrade crowed with his fist up and parallel to the looming swarm over the tavern. “Who is next?”
General Summary
The second in Marcia Wilson’s series about Scotland Yard (the first being You Buy Bones, a book all Watsonians should look into because of its focus on Watson), The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon does not disappoint. This is a book that is clearly setting up for a series, a possibly a lengthy one, given that it begins in the early 1880s and gives us a glimpse at Moriarty and his maneuvers from the get-go.
The story focuses on Lestrade, and does incredibly well by him. He is depicted as competent above all else, with his approach to policework being less about the mind (such as Gregson and Holmes) and more about getting out and finding evidence. It is the difference between, if I may borrow from another book series, a Hufflepuff and a Ravenclaw- both approaches are useful, just different. Lestrade is granted a dignity he so often lacks in other stories, as is the rest of Scotland Yard. We have a number of Canon Inspectors and Constables appear and each of them has a unique personality and history that is consistent with what we see of them in the original stories. We also get a look at what policing in the 1880s was like, and suddenly it becomes clear both why Holmes doesn’t want to be a Yarder and why the Yard needs someone like Holmes from time to time. The thanklessness of being a policeman isn’t shied away from, even as we see our Inspectors doing their best to do right.
The mystery itself has multiple parts. We meet a new villain, who is sincerely awful and has a history with Lestrade. We have several different cases that the Yarders are working on, which come together in various ways, making it a fun read as you try to decide which cases are connected, if any, and how they are all connected. The author makes a point of setting up Moriarty as potentially involved in some way at the start of the book, making it as much about the Yarders as it is about the construction and unveiling of Moriarty’s Empire- something I am VERY excited to read about.
The lives and personalities of the Canon characters are perfection, but we also have a number of amazing original characters as well that weave together with familiar ones to create a full and rich world. The Cheatham family as a whole will intrigue anyone who enjoys complicated family dynamics; our new villain is quietly, charmingly frightening; and most importantly, we meet a new heroine, who is very worthy of joining the pantheon of Holmesian Heroines. Clea Cheatham is clever, hardworking, tough, and yet achingly vulnerable at various points in the novel.
Another thing I enjoyed had nothing to do with the writing or the story, but the illustrations. The author herself drew little pictures for the start of each chapter, as well as a full portrait at the very beginning of the book of members of the Yard. The illustrations are utterly charming, and truly add to the experience of the book.
Though the novel has a number of editing issues that sometimes detract from ones enjoyment, The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon isn’t one to miss. And if you don’t trust my word, trust our own “Marker,” David Marcum, who is quoted as saying “Marcia Wilson has discovered Scotland Yard’s Tin Dispatch Box” on the back of the book- high praise!
What About Our Watson?
While Watson isn’t as present in this book as he is in Wilson’s previous published work, he is still very much a part of this story. The Yarders like and appreciate Watson, and in many ways would prefer to consult with him rather than Holmes. He is the Yarders’ preferred doctor, whenever possible, because of his professionalism and willingness to be discrete. Watson is shown, however, to be more than just a professional associate; he is shown to be friendly with them, in particular Lestrade, who he sometimes visits for social reasons rather than medical or professional ones. The rapport they share is comfortable and warm, and it makes for interesting insights into who Watson is.
Watson is shown to contribute meaningfully to Holmes’ work as well, as Holmes defers to Watson’s medical expertise and values his insights. He is with Holmes throughout the investigation, even, at one point, dressed in a truly hilarious disguise that Holmes gave to him. He is deeply loyal to Holmes- sometimes frustratingly so, from the Yarders’ perspective, as he won’t tell tales out of school about Holmes- and their friendship is often reflected on by other characters, who don’t quite understand it but respect it all the same.
If a Watsonian decides to pick up this book, I would still recommend that you read You Buy Bones first, both for the continuity between the two and for the amount of Watson you’ll encounter, but this book will not disappoint if you want a good, capable, heroic Watson.
You Might Like This Book If You Like:
Canon Scotland Yard characters; lots of historical details; Moriarty machinations; workplace stories
On January 4th…
January 4, 1885: Joseph Openshaw received five orange pips. [FIVE]
January 4, 1891: Holmes crossed Moriarty’ s path. [FINA]
On January 3rd…
January 3, 1881: Holmes moved into 221B Baker Street. [STUD]
January 3, 1903: James Dodd received an amicable reply to his letter from Mrs. Emsworth. [BLAN]
On January 2nd…
January 2, 1881: Watson moved into 221B Baker Street. [STUD]
On December 31st…
December 31, 1902: James Dodd’s letter arrived at Tuxbury Old Park. [BLAN]
Friend & Biographer Series: JHWS ‘Leo’
Speaking of my old friend and biographer, I would take this opportunity to remark….Watson has some remarkable characteristics of his own, to which in his modesty he has given small attention…
Hello Watsonians,
Today marks the first post in a new series of brief biographic interviews with some of the members of JHWS. Our members, like the good Dr. Watson, have some remarkable characteristics of their own, and we would like to give some small attention to them. The series will run on a varying schedule as time and participation permit.
Please see below for the interview with our Texas friend, Stu Nelan.
Enjoy!
Margie/ JHWS ‘Mopsy’
- Name/with bull pup moniker—
Stuart Nelan, ‘Leo’
- Current (city, state, country) location—
Melissa, Texas, USA
- How long have you been a devotee of Dr. Watson?
Over 50 years. I discovered the Sherlock Holmes/Dr. Watson stories before high school and read some of them, and then was delighted to find the Doubleday book of the complete adventures after graduating college and moving to Dallas.
Shortly thereafter, there was an article in the local newspaper about the BSI, giving contact information for John Bennet Shaw. I mailed him a letter asking about joining, and he kindly replied suggesting that I join the local group and gave me the name.
I took me 15 years to follow up on that, but I eventually did and the rest is history.
- Do you have a favorite canonical story?
Without a doubt, The Blue Carbuncle is my favorite! It is such a nice Christmas story, and as Christopher Morley put it “a Christmas story without slush”.
- What is your favorite quote from the canon?
“The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession”, from The Valley of Fear. My career is in software development and support, and this quote reminds me of one of the big pitfalls in my work.
- If you could speak directly to anyone in the canon, who would you choose and why?
Dr. Watson, of course! Holmes might be the more knowledgeable of the two, but as a dinner companion, for instance, Watson would be the obvious choice with his repertoire of stories and ability to tell them to entertain his audience.
- Are you fond of any particular canon adaptations—pastiche, radio, film?
Each one has its plusses and minuses, I guess, but overall I would have to go with the Basil Rathbone movies – they are the ones that I go to when I’m looking for a Sherlockian movie.
- Do you have a local Watsonian/Sherlockian/Holmesian group you meet with on a regular basis?
The Crew of the Barque Lone Star meets on the first Sunday of each month in Addison (a suburb of Dallas). All are welcome to join us!
- Do you have any recent Watsonian/Sherlockian/Holmesian projects/events you would like to tell us about?
BSI Weekend is coming up, and I am looking forward to going and seeing old (and young) Sherlockian friends again!