January 8, 1885: Joseph Openshaw visited Major Freebody. [FIVE]
January 8, 1888: Cecil Barker fished Ted Baldwin’s clothes from the moat. [VALL]
January 8, 1888: Jack Douglas confessed to killing Ted Baldwin. [VALL]
The Open and Inclusive Worldwide Online Sherlockian Society (Really, We're about Having Fun)
January 8, 1885: Joseph Openshaw visited Major Freebody. [FIVE]
January 8, 1888: Cecil Barker fished Ted Baldwin’s clothes from the moat. [VALL]
January 8, 1888: Jack Douglas confessed to killing Ted Baldwin. [VALL]
January 7, 1886: Milverton sent an incriminating note to the husband of one of his blackmailees. [CHAS]
January 7, 1888: Holmes received an encoded message from Porlock. [VALL]
January 7, 1903: James Dodd left Old Tuxbury for London, where he consulted Sherlock Holmes. [BLAN]
January 6, 1886: Charles Augustus Milverton called upon Holmes at 221B Baker Street. [CHAS]
January 6, 1888: Jack Douglas shot and killed Ted Baldwin. [VALL]
January 6, 1903: Colonel Emsworth told James Dodd that he must leave Tuxsbury Old Park the next morning. [BLAN]
And the most IMPORTANT:
Friday, January 6, 1854: Sherlock Holmes was born!
January 5, 1903: James Dodd traveled from London to Bedford and thence to Tuxbury Old Place. [BLAN]
January 5, 1903: James Dodd saw the face of Godfrey Emsworth at his bedroom window. [BLAN]
by Marcia Wilson
MXPublishing (December 2016)
273 p. ISBN 9781787050297
Lestrade panted, getting to his feet as the gang of Cheathams fell back. “Right now I can think of worse things than rescue by an amateur detective.”
“My dear Lestrade, we’re simply ensuring the fight is fair.” Sherlock Holmes somehow dissuaded the truth of that by the way his lips were coiling up at the edges (without letting go of the pipe in his teeth). Perhaps it was because he was clearly in disguise as a seedy deckhand in Dutchman’s sailing clothes.
From behind him the little professional could see Dr. Watson, tarred like a sailor and armed with a wicked-looking blackthorn.
“Well, then!” Lestrade crowed with his fist up and parallel to the looming swarm over the tavern. “Who is next?”
The second in Marcia Wilson’s series about Scotland Yard (the first being You Buy Bones, a book all Watsonians should look into because of its focus on Watson), The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon does not disappoint. This is a book that is clearly setting up for a series, a possibly a lengthy one, given that it begins in the early 1880s and gives us a glimpse at Moriarty and his maneuvers from the get-go.
The story focuses on Lestrade, and does incredibly well by him. He is depicted as competent above all else, with his approach to policework being less about the mind (such as Gregson and Holmes) and more about getting out and finding evidence. It is the difference between, if I may borrow from another book series, a Hufflepuff and a Ravenclaw- both approaches are useful, just different. Lestrade is granted a dignity he so often lacks in other stories, as is the rest of Scotland Yard. We have a number of Canon Inspectors and Constables appear and each of them has a unique personality and history that is consistent with what we see of them in the original stories. We also get a look at what policing in the 1880s was like, and suddenly it becomes clear both why Holmes doesn’t want to be a Yarder and why the Yard needs someone like Holmes from time to time. The thanklessness of being a policeman isn’t shied away from, even as we see our Inspectors doing their best to do right.
The mystery itself has multiple parts. We meet a new villain, who is sincerely awful and has a history with Lestrade. We have several different cases that the Yarders are working on, which come together in various ways, making it a fun read as you try to decide which cases are connected, if any, and how they are all connected. The author makes a point of setting up Moriarty as potentially involved in some way at the start of the book, making it as much about the Yarders as it is about the construction and unveiling of Moriarty’s Empire- something I am VERY excited to read about.
The lives and personalities of the Canon characters are perfection, but we also have a number of amazing original characters as well that weave together with familiar ones to create a full and rich world. The Cheatham family as a whole will intrigue anyone who enjoys complicated family dynamics; our new villain is quietly, charmingly frightening; and most importantly, we meet a new heroine, who is very worthy of joining the pantheon of Holmesian Heroines. Clea Cheatham is clever, hardworking, tough, and yet achingly vulnerable at various points in the novel.
Another thing I enjoyed had nothing to do with the writing or the story, but the illustrations. The author herself drew little pictures for the start of each chapter, as well as a full portrait at the very beginning of the book of members of the Yard. The illustrations are utterly charming, and truly add to the experience of the book.
Though the novel has a number of editing issues that sometimes detract from ones enjoyment, The Adventure of the Flying Blue Pidgeon isn’t one to miss. And if you don’t trust my word, trust our own “Marker,” David Marcum, who is quoted as saying “Marcia Wilson has discovered Scotland Yard’s Tin Dispatch Box” on the back of the book- high praise!
While Watson isn’t as present in this book as he is in Wilson’s previous published work, he is still very much a part of this story. The Yarders like and appreciate Watson, and in many ways would prefer to consult with him rather than Holmes. He is the Yarders’ preferred doctor, whenever possible, because of his professionalism and willingness to be discrete. Watson is shown, however, to be more than just a professional associate; he is shown to be friendly with them, in particular Lestrade, who he sometimes visits for social reasons rather than medical or professional ones. The rapport they share is comfortable and warm, and it makes for interesting insights into who Watson is.
Watson is shown to contribute meaningfully to Holmes’ work as well, as Holmes defers to Watson’s medical expertise and values his insights. He is with Holmes throughout the investigation, even, at one point, dressed in a truly hilarious disguise that Holmes gave to him. He is deeply loyal to Holmes- sometimes frustratingly so, from the Yarders’ perspective, as he won’t tell tales out of school about Holmes- and their friendship is often reflected on by other characters, who don’t quite understand it but respect it all the same.
If a Watsonian decides to pick up this book, I would still recommend that you read You Buy Bones first, both for the continuity between the two and for the amount of Watson you’ll encounter, but this book will not disappoint if you want a good, capable, heroic Watson.
Canon Scotland Yard characters; lots of historical details; Moriarty machinations; workplace stories
January 4, 1885: Joseph Openshaw received five orange pips. [FIVE]
January 4, 1891: Holmes crossed Moriarty’ s path. [FINA]
January 3, 1881: Holmes moved into 221B Baker Street. [STUD]
January 3, 1903: James Dodd received an amicable reply to his letter from Mrs. Emsworth. [BLAN]
January 2, 1881: Watson moved into 221B Baker Street. [STUD]
December 31, 1902: James Dodd’s letter arrived at Tuxbury Old Park. [BLAN]
Speaking of my old friend and biographer, I would take this opportunity to remark….Watson has some remarkable characteristics of his own, to which in his modesty he has given small attention…
Hello Watsonians,
Today marks the first post in a new series of brief biographic interviews with some of the members of JHWS. Our members, like the good Dr. Watson, have some remarkable characteristics of their own, and we would like to give some small attention to them. The series will run on a varying schedule as time and participation permit.
Please see below for the interview with our Texas friend, Stu Nelan.
Enjoy!
Margie/ JHWS ‘Mopsy’
Stuart Nelan, ‘Leo’
Melissa, Texas, USA
Over 50 years. I discovered the Sherlock Holmes/Dr. Watson stories before high school and read some of them, and then was delighted to find the Doubleday book of the complete adventures after graduating college and moving to Dallas.
Shortly thereafter, there was an article in the local newspaper about the BSI, giving contact information for John Bennet Shaw. I mailed him a letter asking about joining, and he kindly replied suggesting that I join the local group and gave me the name.
I took me 15 years to follow up on that, but I eventually did and the rest is history.
Without a doubt, The Blue Carbuncle is my favorite! It is such a nice Christmas story, and as Christopher Morley put it “a Christmas story without slush”.
“The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession”, from The Valley of Fear. My career is in software development and support, and this quote reminds me of one of the big pitfalls in my work.
Dr. Watson, of course! Holmes might be the more knowledgeable of the two, but as a dinner companion, for instance, Watson would be the obvious choice with his repertoire of stories and ability to tell them to entertain his audience.
Each one has its plusses and minuses, I guess, but overall I would have to go with the Basil Rathbone movies – they are the ones that I go to when I’m looking for a Sherlockian movie.
The Crew of the Barque Lone Star meets on the first Sunday of each month in Addison (a suburb of Dallas). All are welcome to join us!
BSI Weekend is coming up, and I am looking forward to going and seeing old (and young) Sherlockian friends again!
December 30, 1902: James Dodd wrote a letter to Godfrey Emsworth’s mother. [BLAN]
I had called upon my friend Sherlock Holmes upon the second morning after Christmas, with the intention of wishing him the compliments of the season. [BLUE]
Whatever holidays you celebrate – or if you celebrate no holidays at all – we at the Consulting Rooms hope that you are enjoying time with your own friends and loved ones. This has been a difficult year for many, so if you are finding this time of year particularly hard, please also know that we are thinking of you.
Wishing you all the best,
“Selena Buttons”
December 27, 1889: Watson wished Holmes the compliments of the season. [BLUE]
December 27, 1889: Holmes traced the goose in whose crop the blue carbuncle was found to the Alpha Inn and thence to Breckinridge’s stall at Covent Garden. [BLUE]
December 27, 1889: James Ryder confessed to stealing the blue carbuncle. [BLUE]
December 27, 1889: Holmes decided to allow James Ryder to go free. [BLUE]
December 25, 1880: Julia Stoner met a half-pay Major. [SIGN]
December 25, 1889: Henry Baker lost his hat and goose. [BLUE]
December 23, 1879: Sebastian Moran fought in the Battle of Sherpur. [EMPT]
December 22, 1889: The Countess of Morcar’s blue carbuncle disappeared. [BLUE]
December 22, 1889: Jack Horner was arrested in the evening for stealing the blue carbuncle. [BLUE]
When Sherlock Holmes turns down the case of persecuted Laura Shirley, Mrs Hudson – the landlady of Baker Street – and Mary Watson – the wife of Dr Watson – resolve to take on the investigation themselves. From the kitchen of 221b, the two women begin their inquiries and enlist the assistance of the Baker Street Irregulars and the infamous Irene Adler.
A trail of clues leads them to the darkest corners of Whitechapel, where the fearsome Ripper supposedly still stalks. They soon discover Laura Shirley is not the only woman at risk – the lives of many others are in danger too.
As Mrs Hudson and Mary Watson put together the pieces of an increasingly complex puzzle, the investigation becomes bigger than either of them could ever have imagined. Can they solve the case or are they just pawns in a much larger game?
The House at Baker Street may easily be one of the strongest pastiches that came out in 2016, and it’s certainly my favorite. It tells the story of Mrs Hudson and Mary Watson making the choice to take on the role of detective after Mr Holmes rejects a client they feel needs help. It is a simple enough premise, but one executed to great effect in this book.
The story is told from Mrs Hudson’s POV, and the narrative is occasionally meandering, occasionally wandering, and brings to mind a story not written down as a book but rather one she is speaking out loud. The writing style makes you feel as though you’re sitting at Mrs Hudson’s bedside, hearing her confess the secrets of her life, the things she’s never been able to bring herself to say before now.
And the secrets are a major theme in this book. The mystery itself, a somewhat straightforward case of blackmail (with a few twists), is naturally all about secrets: the secrets of the victimized women, the secrets of the blackmailer’s assistants, and the secrets of the blackmailers themselves. But what’s particularly lovely about this book are the secrets that aren’t actually tied to the mystery (which does sometimes become a plodding, ponderous thing, though not so much that it hurt my enjoyment of this book).
There are the secrets that Holmes and Watson keep from Mrs Hudson and Mary, the secrets of their clients and cases. There are the secrets that our heroines keep from the men, both personal and in the course of their own case. Most interesting to me are the secrets of Canon introduced to the reader, such as how Holmes and Mrs Hudson met, or how Mrs Hudson took the news that Mary and John were to marry. If you’ve ever wondered what happens behind the scenes of the Canon, this book offers up a number of fascinating suggestions.
There is also the secret Mrs Hudson withholds from the story, one that she hints at throughout the book. It’s a secret most Holmesians can easily discern, knowing as we do how the Canon goes, but seeing how this author will execute it keeps this reader, at least, feeling both excitement and dread for the books still to come in this series.
Mrs Hudson is a phenomenal protagonist, a woman who has always desired adventure and excitement and instead found herself creating what life she could on a heap of disappointments, satisfying herself by listening at the air vent to the cases that come to Holmes and Watson. She is a smart woman, and deeply compassionate – her relationship with the Irregulars is one of the strongest parts of this book – and she makes an excellent detective in the end, though it takes her a while to reach her conclusions. She doubts herself at times, and wonders what she’s doing, but she is a natural observer and has a talent for seeing the big picture. She’s more hesitant and practical than Mary, but she is also fiercely loyal and brave, two traits which drive her throughout the story.
There is enormous affection for Sherlock Holmes and John Watson, despite the narrative’s implicit criticism of Holmes’ seeming disregard for Mrs Shirley. Though both Mary and Mrs Hudson are disappointed in Holmes for doing so, he is never depicted as a villain or a cruel man, just a flawed one who sometimes cannot see beyond his own assumptions of the world. It’s a remarkably nuanced approach to Holmes, and one I’d love to see more of in other pastiches.
Many of the secondary characters drawn from Canon get a lovely treatment too. We get to know a number of Irregulars and see their own personal relationships with Mrs Hudson. There are Canonical antagonists, both infamous (as the publisher’s summary suggests) and less well known. While some readers may feel that the book packs too many Canonical characters in, I thought they all served a purpose and weren’t just there to show that the author knows her Canon. Rather, they are all given a rich personal life, and fit well within the themes of the book.
There is so much more that I want to mention and talk about in this review but can’t, for fear of spoilers. I truly adored this pastiche, and am very much looking forward to the sequel, which comes out in February of 2017, only two months from now!
John Watson appears here as perfectly as one might hope. He is always haring off with Holmes, gun in hand, helping him with his current cases. He is shown as intensely loyal to Holmes, caring and respectful of Mary, and also as a kind and loyal friend to Mrs Hudson. We get to see him as a doctor on multiple occasions, and every time he is competent and comforting. He is also the ultimate secret keeper, in my opinion, as he finds a way to both keep and respect Mary’s secrets while protecting Holmes’ as well. He is an excellent partner, friend, and husband. Honestly, he just wins all the husband awards in this book. I wish more people would portray the marriage between Mary and Watson like this: affectionate, teasing, and full of implicit trust.
And then there’s Mary. While this Society is devoted to John H Watson, I decided that Mary Watson should be my focus when discussing the Watsonian aspects of this book. As it is written in the book, “If he loved her, she must be worth his loving.”
Mary Watson is an absolute gem, and is the best part of this book for me. She is truly the Mary Watson we meet in SIGN, so incredibly smart and adventurous and more than a match for John. Mary is the energy of our detective duo here, brimming with enthusiasm and passion for what they’re trying to do. Holmes himself credited Mary with “a decided genius” in SIGN, and it is on full display here. Her powers of deduction are less refined, but as she explains, she’s listened to enough of John’s stories to know the basics of applying the skills. She is also deeply compassionate and social, and her kindness often moves the case along as people instinctively open up to her (“birds to a lighthouse” indeed!).
That isn’t to say she’s shown as perfect. In fact, Mary is a bit reckless, horribly stubborn, and has a sharp and abrupt temper, all of which cause problems for her at different points. But it’s impossible not to love Mary, who so desperately wants to help, and who so desperately wants to be more than a housewife.
I will admit, I haven’t seen many depictions of Mary in pastiches. She’s often relegated to the side as having waved Watson off for his own adventures, if she’s a character in them at all. But other books will be hard-pressed to show me a stronger, fiercer Mary than this one. This is a Mary who is certainly worthy of John Watson – although here, I might instead say that Watson is worthy of this Mary. I am certainly looking forward to the next book and finding out how Mary handles their latest mystery.
Women Protagonists; Backstories and Character-Driven Stories; the Baker Street Babes Podcast; Examinations of Class and Gender in Victorian London
(Note from Selena Buttons: This review was supposed to appear last Thursday, but was delayed by technical difficulties. Apologies, Lucy!)
Just in case you somehow missed the news, the latest teaser trailer for the fourth series of the BBC’s Sherlock hit the Internet this past weekend.
There has already been plentiful discussion and dissection of the 48 seconds of footage, and there are still two weeks to examine each frame for those clues that might be seen but not observed.
What are your thoughts on what the new season might hold?
December 10, 1896: Godfrey Staunton’s wife died. [MISS]